Submission 2 | Proteinbase

Proteins
Collections
Design Methods
Targets
Competitions

Submission 2 | Proteinbase

N

NipahHunter/Submission 2

Download Collection

Submitted toNipah Binder Competition

Description

The samples are generated using a de novo binder design model which will be released publicly later.

Proteins (10)

TableGrid

id: strong-falcon-ice

Binder

Other

strong-falcon-ice

Multiple (2)

Strong (6)

True

15.6 kDa

137

id: swift-jaguar-clay

Binder

Other

swift-jaguar-clay

Multiple (2)

Strong (6)

85.69

True

15.6 kDa

137

id: vast-ibis-cypress

Binder

Other

vast-ibis-cypress

Multiple (2)

Strong (6)

True

15.6 kDa

137

id: shy-moth-ruby

Binder

Other

shy-moth-ruby

Multiple (2)

Strong (6)

True

15.6 kDa

137

id: noble-deer-willow

Binder

Other

noble-deer-willow

Multiple (2)

Strong (6)

True

15.6 kDa

137

id: silent-zebra-thorn

Binder

Nanobody

silent-zebra-thorn

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

None

76.40

False

14.5 kDa

132

id: jade-falcon-granite

Binder

Miniprotein

jade-falcon-granite

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

None

68.98

True

10.0 kDa

90

id: deep-bison-wave

Binder

Miniprotein

deep-bison-wave

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

None

92.26

True

7.1 kDa

62

id: radiant-dove-willow

Binder

Miniprotein

radiant-dove-willow

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

None

91.16

True

7.1 kDa

62

id: dark-ibis-wave

Binder

Miniprotein

dark-ibis-wave

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

None

76.69

True

8.1 kDa

72

Rows per page

1-10 of 10

About

10proteins designed

10proteins validated

5binders

90%expression rate

0.78Avg ipSAE

Targets

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G

5 binders•1.0e-8 avg KD

Human Serum Albumin

0 binders•-- avg KD

Design Class

other 50%

miniprotein 40%

nanobody 10%

Binding Strength

none 67%

strong 33%

Expressed

true 90%

false 10%

De Novo

no 80%

yes 20%

Classification

alpha Beta 60%

mainly Alpha 30%

mainly Beta 10%

Architecture

unknown 100%