BoltzGen followed by additional nanobody design steps is used to generate this submission. I went over the top nanobody submissions and it seems like the top score of this batch (ipSAE 0.86) is the highest. Because of the natural disadvantage of nanobodies over mini-binders being evaluated by ipSAE as mentioned by other groups, I believe it's interesting to see if these perform well in wet lab.
id: rough-ant-birch

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.86
83.98
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: golden-lynx-quartz

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.84
85.97
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: silent-goat-frost

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.79
83.33
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: rough-seal-lava

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.79
83.98
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: bright-crow-stone

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.78
84.85
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: scarlet-panda-onyx

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.74
83.70
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: bright-cobra-frost

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.73
83.28
--
13.6 kDa
128
id: lunar-cat-cypress

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.72
83.48
--
13.7 kDa
128
id: vast-cobra-wave

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.62
83.75
--
13.8 kDa
128
id: noble-quail-willow

Nipah Virus Glycoprotein G
0.56
83.42
--
13.7 kDa
128